← Back to overview
Rank 3 · Infra / derivatives L1

Injective INJ

MC ~$476M FDV ~$476M (fully unlocked) Supply 99.97M / 100M cap All-time burned ~7M INJ
Composite49.6 #12 of 25
Buyback yield0.9% $4.5M/yr
P/S109.3× sector 582.3×
Below 1y peak66% 2.9× to reclaim
Float100% FDV $491.3M
Fwd P/S y374.4× base case
Moat50 judgement
Innovation55 judgement
Moat 50. An L1 with a native orderbook and regulated wrappers accumulating, but a modest ecosystem. Chains without application gravity are not defensible on architecture alone.

Innovation 55. Native on-chain orderbook L1 with MEV-resistant execution. Solid engineering, but the design follows prior orderbook-chain attempts rather than opening new ground.
Measured from live data, except Moat and Innovation which are hand-set judgements · snapshot 2026-08-23 · full model →

What it does

Injective is a Cosmos-based Layer 1 optimized for on-chain derivatives, FX, and RWA order-book DeFi. It has a native orderbook, MEV-resistant execution, and increasingly is being used as the settlement layer for regulated wrappers of INJ-related products.

Fundamentals

Tokenomics

Catalysts (6–12mo)

Risks

Strong Buy. Best risk-adjusted setup in the whole modular/infra basket: no dilution risk, working buyback, regulated distribution moat, fundamentals justify inclusion despite being relatively well-known.

How it compares to its peers

L1Mkt capRevenue/yrGrowth/yrBull y3 revP/SFwd P/S y3Buyback
Sui$3.2B$853.4K-41%$327.9K3767.4×9803.5×0.0%
Aptos$518.5M$1.7M-2%$1.8M306.0×319.2×0.3%
Injective$491.3M$4.5M21%$6.0M109.3×74.4×0.9%
Monad$321.8M$1.3M27%$2.1M246.8×153.5×0.4%
Sei$302.2M$102.9K-34%$95.7K2936.4×6438.1×
Sonic$101.7M$216.3K-36%$94.5K470.3×1076.9×
Berachain$55.9M$80.6K-36%$230.3K694.2×1589.6×
MegaETH$43.9M-6%
Movement$32.5M$836-35%$37338882.2×87042.1×0.0%
Initia$11.0M

Sector median P/S is 582.3×. Injective trades at 109.3× — below the median, worth 433% if it re-rated to it. Note: this sector's peers carry very little revenue against their market caps, so the median multiple is not a meaningful valuation anchor here - the market is not pricing these on revenue. The value component is excluded from the composite score for this reason. Peer revenue growth runs at a median of -34% a year, with 7 of 9 shrinking — so this multiple sits inside a contracting sector.

Sources